There is no real "conversion" of a raster image into a vector graphic (unless you simply display each pixel as a vector rectangle-which would be the functional equivalent of a raster image, but less efficient). But it would be nothing more than an Illustrator file serving (rather pointlessly) as a "box" containing the raster image. So you could import ("Place" or "Open") a raster image created in Photoshop into Illustrator, and the result would certainly be an Illustrator file. When they do that, those objects are still in their "object format" they're just "wrapped up" inside the program's file format.Ĭontain a raster image along with its native vector paths. They have certain object types that are native to them, but they can also either reference or contain other object types that they really don't understand. Page layout programs and vector illustration programs are like that. There are several formats (think of them as "conventions") for recording those values (JPEG, TIFF, PNG, etc.) But they are all just different syntaxes, so to speak, for describing always the same kind of thing (object).īy "meta formats" I mean data formats for files that can reference and/or contain a variety of different "object formats". It's just an array of color values displayed as tiny rectangles arranged in a rectangular grid. You are misunderstanding something very very basic here: The difference between raster and vector artwork, and the difference between what I'll call "object formats" and "meta formats."īy "object formats" I mean data formats that describe a specific kind of digital object. a company wants to make jewelry from my photoshop files converted to AI
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |